Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 98
Filter
2.
Epilepsy Behav ; 142: 109192, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2298441

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Adolescents with epilepsy are at heightened risk for suboptimal anti-seizure medication (ASM) adherence; however, there is a paucity of adherence interventions for this age group. The current study aimed to identify a comprehensive and novel set of predictors of objective, electronically-monitored ASM adherence in adolescents with epilepsy. METHODS: Participants included 104 adolescents (13-17 years old; M = 15.36 ± 1.40), diagnosed with epilepsy and their caregivers. Cross-sectional data were collected from adolescents, caregivers, healthcare providers, and medical chart reviews, including demographics (i.e., age, race/ethnicity, sex, insurance status), the COVID-19 pandemic (i.e., participation before versus during), seizure characteristics (i.e., presence and severity), ASM side effects (Pediatric Epilepsy Side Effects Questionnaire), adherence motivation (1-item 6-point Likert scale item), and adherence barriers (Pediatric Epilepsy Medication Self-Management Questionnaire). Electronically-monitored adherence data was collected via the AdhereTechTM pill bottle or the Vaica SimpleMedTM pillbox over 30 days. RESULTS: Adolescents demonstrated suboptimal adherence at 78 ± 31.6%, despite high ASM adherence motivation (M = 4.43 ± .94) and minimal adherence barriers (M = 35.64 ± 3.78). Hierarchical multiple regression, which included non-modifiable sociodemographic and medical variables (Block 1) and behaviorally modifiable psychosocial variables (Block 2) was significant, F(12,87) = 3.69, p < .001. Specifically, having private insurance (versus Medicaid or public insurance; t = -2.11, p = .038) and higher adherence motivation (t = 2.91, p = .005) predicted higher objective ASM adherence. CONCLUSION: Routine assessment of adherence predictors is vital for the promotion of adherence among adolescents with epilepsy. Adolescent adherence motivation may be an important element of multi-component interventions focused on improving ASM adherence in adolescents with epilepsy.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Epilepsy , Humans , Child , Adolescent , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Motivation , Cross-Sectional Studies , Pandemics , Epilepsy/drug therapy , Epilepsy/epidemiology , Epilepsy/psychology , Medication Adherence/psychology
3.
Epilepsy Behav ; 141: 109145, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2286535

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To quantify sponsor-reported shortages of oral antiseizure medications in Australia, estimate the number of patients impacted, and the association between shortages and brand or formulation switching, and changes in adherence. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of sponsor-reported shortages (defined as where the supply of a medicine will not or will not be likely to meet the demand over a 6-month period) of antiseizure medications reported to the Medicine Shortages Reports Database (Therapeutic Goods Administration, Australia); cross-referencing shortages to the IQVIA-NostraData Dispensing Data (LRx) database, a deidentified, population-level dataset collecting longitudinal dispensation data on individual patients from ∼75% of Australian community pharmacy scripts. RESULTS: Ninety-seven sponsor-reported ASM shortages were identified between 2019 and 2020; of those, 90 (93%) were shortages of generic ASM brands. Of 1,247,787 patients dispensed ≥1 ASMs, 242,947 (19.5%) were impacted by shortages. Sponsor-reported shortages occurred more frequently before the COVID-19 pandemic versus during the pandemic, however, shortages were estimated to affect more patients during the pandemic than before the pandemic. An estimated 330,872 patient-level shortage events were observed, and 98.5% were associated with shortages of generic ASM brands. Shortages occurred at a rate of 41.06 shortages per 100 person-years in patients on generic ASM brands versus 0.83 shortages per 100 person-years in patients on originator ASM brands. In patients taking a formulation of levetiracetam affected by a shortage, 67.6% switched to a different levetiracetam brand or formulation during shortages compared with 46.6% in non-shortage periods. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 20% of patients on ASMs were estimated to have been impacted by an ASM shortage in Australia. The rate of patient-level shortages was approximately 50 times higher for patients on generic ASM brands versus originator brands. Shortages of levetiracetam were associated with formulation and brand switching. Improved supply chain management amongst sponsors of generic ASMs is needed to maintain the continuity of supply in Australia.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Humans , Levetiracetam , Retrospective Studies , Australia , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Drugs, Generic/therapeutic use , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use
4.
Seizure ; 106: 138-147, 2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2279879

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Current dietary therapies for epilepsy have side effects and are low in nutrients, which would make an alternative dietary treatment, which addresses these issues, advantageous. One potential option is the low glutamate diet (LGD). Glutamate is implicated in seizure activity. Blood brain barrier permeability in epilepsy could enable dietary glutamate to reach the brain and contribute to ictogenesis. OBJECTIVE: to assess the LGD as an adjunct treatment for pediatric epilepsy. METHODS: This study was a nonblinded, parallel, randomized clinical trial. The study was conducted virtually due to COVID-19 and registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04545346). Participants were eligible if they were between the ages of 2 and 21 with ≥4 seizures per month. Baseline seizures were assessed for 1-month, then participants were allocated via block randomization to the intervention month (N=18), or a wait-listed control month followed by the intervention month (N=15). Outcome measures included seizure frequency, caregiver global impression of change (CGIC), non-seizure improvements, nutrient intake, and adverse events. RESULTS: Nutrient intake significantly increased during the intervention. No significant differences in seizure frequency were observed between intervention and control groups. However, efficacy was assessed at 1-month compared to the standard 3-months in diet research. Additionally, 21% of participants were observed to be clinical responders to the diet. Overall health (CGIC) significantly improved in 31%, 63% experienced ≥1 non-seizure improvements, and 53% experienced adverse events. Clinical response likelihood decreased with increasing age (0.71 [0.50-0.99], p=0.04), as did the likelihood of overall health improvement (0.71 [0.54-0.92], p=0.01). DISCUSSION: This study provides preliminary support for the LGD as an adjunct treatment before epilepsy becomes drug resistant, which is in contrast to the role of current dietary therapies in drug resistant epilepsy.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Drug Resistant Epilepsy , Epilepsy , Child , Humans , Child, Preschool , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Glutamic Acid/therapeutic use , Pilot Projects , Epilepsy/drug therapy , Seizures/drug therapy , Drug Resistant Epilepsy/drug therapy , Diet , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use
5.
Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova ; 123(3): 130-136, 2023.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2276728

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of phenosanoic acid therapy on the frequency of seizures, asthenia and quality of life of adult patients with focal epilepsy who had a new coronavirus infection caused by SARS-CoV-2. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The data of 20 patients with focal epilepsy who suffered COVID-19 and received therapy with phenosanic acid (Dibufelon) were studied. The frequency of epileptic seizures, the severity of asthenia and the quality of life were evaluated according to clinical scales. RESULTS: Significant decrease in the frequency of bilateral tonic-clonic seizures and focal seizures with loss of consciousness was recorded. There was a significant improvement in the quality of life. There was no significant dynamics of asthenia against the background of taking the drug phenosanic acid in patients. CONCLUSION: The preparation of phenosanic acid can be an effective means of add-on therapy in patients with epilepsy who have undergone COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Epilepsies, Partial , Epilepsy, Tonic-Clonic , Epilepsy , Adult , Humans , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Asthenia/drug therapy , Quality of Life , SARS-CoV-2 , Seizures/drug therapy , Epilepsies, Partial/drug therapy , Epilepsy/drug therapy
6.
Chin Med J (Engl) ; 136(5): 571-577, 2023 Mar 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2258721

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Given that seizures may be triggered by vaccination, this study aimed to evaluate the risk and correlative factors of seizures in patients with epilepsy (PWE) after being vaccinated against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: This study retrospectively enrolled PWE who were vaccinated against COVID-19 in the epilepsy centers of 11 hospitals in China. We divided the PWE into two groups as follows: (1) patients who developed seizures within 14 days of vaccination were assigned to the SAV (with seizures after vaccination) group; (2) patients who were seizure-free within 14 days of vaccination were assigned to the SFAV (seizure-free after vaccination) group. To identify potential risk factors for seizure reccurence, the binary logistic regression analysis was performed. Besides, 67 PWE who had not been vaccinated were also included for elucidating the effects of vaccination on seizures recurrence, and binary logistic regression analysis was performed to determine whether vaccination would affect the recurrence rate of PWE who had drug reduction or withdrawal. RESULTS: The study included a total of 407 patients; of which, 48 (11.8%) developed seizures within 14 days after vaccination (SAV group), whereas 359 (88.2%) remained seizure-free (SFAV group). The binary logistic regression analysis revealed that duration of seizure freedom ( P  < 0.001) and withdrawal from anti-seizure medications (ASMs) or reduction in their dosage during the peri-vaccination period were significantly associated with the recurrence of seizures (odds ratio = 7.384, 95% confidence interval = 1.732-31.488, P  = 0.007). In addition, 32 of 33 patients (97.0%) who were seizure-free for more than three months before vaccination and had a normal electroencephalogram before vaccination did not have any seizures within 14 days of vaccination. A total of 92 (22.6%) patients experienced non-epileptic adverse reactions after vaccination. Binary logistic regression analysis results showed that vaccine did not significantly affect the recurrence rate of PWE who had the behavior of ASMs dose reduction or withdrawal ( P  = 0.143). CONCLUSIONS: PWE need protection from the COVID-19 vaccine. PWE who are seizure-free for >3 months before vaccination should be vaccinated. Whether the remaining PWE should be vaccinated depends on the local prevalence of COVID-19. Finally, PWE should avoid discontinuing ASMs or reducing their dosage during the peri-vaccination period.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Epilepsy , Humans , Retrospective Studies , COVID-19 Vaccines/therapeutic use , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Epilepsy/drug therapy , Vaccination
7.
Pediatr Neurol ; 140: 3-8, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2236860

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We designed this study to investigate the effects of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine on epileptic seizures, as well as its adverse effects, in children with epilepsy (<18 years). METHODS: This anonymous questionnaire study involved a multicenter prospective survey of outpatients and inpatients with epilepsy (<18 years) registered in epilepsy clinics in eight hospitals in six cities of Shandong Province. RESULTS: A total of 224 children with epilepsy were included in the study. Fifty of them experienced general adverse events after vaccination. The most common local adverse events were pain or tenderness at the injection site. The most common systemic adverse effects were muscle soreness and headache. No severe adverse events were reported. There were no significant differences in the number of antiseizure medications (P = 0.459), gender (P = 0.336), etiology (P = 0.449), age (P = 0.499), duration of disease (P = 0.546), or seizure type (P = 0.475) between the patients with and without general adverse events. We found that the risk of seizure after vaccination was decreased in children who were seizure free for more than six months before vaccination. There was no significant difference in the number of seizures during the first month before vaccination, the first month after the first dose, and the first month after the second dose (P = 0.091). CONCLUSION: The benefits of vaccination against COVID-19 outweighed the risks of seizures/relapses and severe adverse events after vaccination for children with epilepsy.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Epilepsy , Humans , Child , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , COVID-19 Vaccines , Prospective Studies , Epilepsy/drug therapy , Seizures/drug therapy
8.
Seizure ; 105: 56-64, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2183261

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Many women with epilepsy need to continue anti-seizure medications (ASMs) throughout pregnancy. The current study investigated adaptive behaviour outcomes in children exposed to topiramate in the womb. METHOD: An observational, cross-sectional study was designed, recruiting mother-child-pairs from the UK Epilepsy and Pregnancy Register (UKEPR). Health, developmental histories and Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scale-Third Edition (VABS-III) assessments were administered via telephone by a blinded researcher, supplemented with prospectively collected pregnancy and medication information. Topiramate monotherapy exposed children were compared to VABS-III normative data as recruitment was disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: Thirty-four women with epilepsy from 135 (25%) initially agreed to participate in the study, of whom 26 women completed telephone interviews about their children (n = 28). Children ranged from 2.5 to 17 years of age at the time of assessment. Six topiramate-exposed children were born small for gestational age, and there were significant associations between birthweight, dose and VABS-III scores. Significantly lower scores were observed in topiramate-exposed children (n = 21) with a significant dose-response relationship established after adjustment for parental educational level. Daily mean dosage was 280.21 mg, with high dosages of topiramate associated with a 12-point reduction in VABS-III scores. Additionally, four topiramate-exposed children (19.05%) had diagnoses of Autism Spectrum Disorder, which was significantly higher than UK prevalence rates (1.1%). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of poorer adaptive behaviour, higher incidence of ASD and associations with birth weight are of concern and require further validation and replication using larger prospectively-recruited samples and comparator cohorts. Implications for research and clinical practice are discussed.


Subject(s)
Autism Spectrum Disorder , COVID-19 , Epilepsy , Pregnancy , Humans , Female , Topiramate/adverse effects , Anticonvulsants/adverse effects , Autism Spectrum Disorder/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Epilepsy/drug therapy , Epilepsy/epidemiology , Epilepsy/diagnosis , Cohort Studies , Adaptation, Psychological
10.
Oxid Med Cell Longev ; 2022: 7692215, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2138248

ABSTRACT

Stroke is the most common cause of epilepsy and ultimately leads to a decrease in the quality of life of those affected. Ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes can both lead to poststroke epilepsy (PSE). Significant risk factors for PSE include age < 65age less than 65 years, stroke severity measured by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), cortical involvement, and genetic factors such as TRPM6 polymorphism. The diagnosis of PSE is made by using imaging modalities, blood biomarkers, and prognostic criteria. Electroencephalography (EEG) is currently the gold standard to diagnose PSE, while new combinations of modalities are being tested to increase diagnostic specificity. This literature review uncovers a newly found mechanism for the pathology of poststroke epilepsy. The pathogenesis of early-onset and late-onset is characterized by sequelae of neuronal cellular hypoxia and disruption of the blood-brain barrier, respectively. Interleukin-6 is responsible for increasing the activity of glial cells, causing gliosis and hyperexcitability of neurons. Epinephrine, high-mobility group protein B1, downregulation of CD32, and upregulation of HLA-DR impact the pathology of poststroke epilepsy by inhibiting the normal neuronal immune response. Decreased levels of neuropeptide Y, a neurotransmitter, act through multiple unique mechanisms, such as inhibiting intracellular Ca2+ accumulation and acting as an anti-inflammatory, also implemented in the worsening progression of poststroke epilepsy. Additionally, CA1 hippocampal resonant neurons that increase theta oscillation are associated with poststroke epilepsy. Hypertensive small vessel disease may also have an implication in the temporal lobe epilepsy by causing occult microinfarctions. Furthermore, this review highlights the potential use of statins as primary prophylaxis against PSE, with multiple studies demonstrating a reduction in incidence using statins alone, statins in combination with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), and statins with aspirin. The evidence strongly suggests that the second generation AEDs are a superior treatment method for PSE. Data from numerous studies demonstrate their relative lack of significant drug interactions, increased tolerability, and potential superiority in maintaining seizure-free status.


Subject(s)
Epilepsy , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors , Stroke , Humans , Aged , Incidence , Quality of Life , Epilepsy/drug therapy , Seizures/drug therapy , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Stroke/complications , Stroke/drug therapy , Stroke/epidemiology , Risk Factors
11.
Clin Neuropharmacol ; 45(6): 175-176, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2119240

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the current study was to investigate whether taking valproic acid (VPA) was protective against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection or severity in patients with epilepsy. METHODS: This was a questionnaire study of 150 people who were taking VPA in monotherapy or polytherapy (since the start of the pandemic or longer) and also 150 people who were not taking VPA (since the start of the pandemic), registered in our epilepsy database. The data compared rates of the seropositivity and severity of infection of COVID-19 between the 2 groups. The latter was assessed, by proxy, vis-à-vis rates of hospital admission and intensive care unit admission. RESULTS: Two hundred forty-one patients were studied, including 130 (53.9%) male and 111 (46.1%) female patients. The mean age of the patients was 30.7 ± 11.4 years. The infection rate and severity of COVID-19 did not significantly differ among patients who were taking VPA and those who were not taking VPA (P = 0.587) and (P = 0.648), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, no support was found for the hypothesis of a protective effect of VPA against the infectivity rate of COVID-19. Neither was there any indication of a disease-modulating effect of VPA in people with active COVID-19 infection. Larger, randomized controlled trials would be warranted to substantiate our conclusion.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Epilepsy , Humans , Male , Female , Young Adult , Adult , Valproic Acid/therapeutic use , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Pilot Projects , Epilepsy/drug therapy
12.
Wounds ; 34(10): E101-E103, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2093176

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: A new MIS-C that develops after the acute stage of COVID-19 infection has recently been reported worldwide. Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome is a rare but potentially severe adverse drug-induced reaction most commonly associated with anticonvulsants. Due to variability in clinical presentation involving cutaneous and multiorgan systems, broad differential diagnosis, and lack of definitive diagnostic tests, diagnosis may be delayed. CASE REPORTS: The authors report 2 cases of pediatric patients who presented with fever, diffuse rash, and exposure to COVID-19 infection with suspected MIS-C. Both patients' medical histories revealed carbamazepine treatment for approximately 2 months. The diagnosis of DRESS syndrome was associated with the use of carbamazepine. CONCLUSIONS: Distinguishing between MIS-C and DRESS syndrome may be difficult due to similar clinical and laboratory features and the lack of definitive diagnostic tests for either condition. When encountering cases like the current report, it is important to consider DRESS syndrome for early diagnosis and medical intervention.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome , Humans , Child , Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome/diagnosis , Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome/etiology , Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome/drug therapy , Carbamazepine/adverse effects , Anticonvulsants/adverse effects
13.
Psychiatr Danub ; 34(Suppl 8): 31-37, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2046927

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Individuals who have suffered from novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) are at risk for developing post-COVID neuropsychiatric disorders, which are an integral part of the Long COVID syndrome. Depression and/or anxiety are considered the most common psychiatric disorders after experiencing COVID-19. Certain antiepileptic drugs, notably, carbamazepine (CMZ), are effective in the treatment of mood disorders, especially as mood stabilizers in bipolar affective disorder (BAD), but the efficacy of CMZ in Long COVID remains to be established. The aim of the review was to investigate pharmacogenetic predictors of safety and efficacy of CMZ in patients with depressive symptoms of Long COVID during the post-infection period. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We carried out a systematic search for publications in English and Russian on the safety and efficacy of CMZ in depressive disorders of different etiologies in the PubMed, Web of Science, Springer, Clinical Keys, Google Schooler, E-Library databases using keywords and combined word searches (carbamazepine, COVID-19, depression, epilepsy, post-COVID-syndrome) for the period from January 01,2020 to June 10, 2022. RESULTS: We review the main adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with CMZ, drug-drug interactions, and genetic predictors of the development of ADR. Here, we consider as risk factors, candidate genes for CMZ metabolism, CMZ transport, immunohistocompatibility genes, and candidate genes for QT prolongation. CONCLUSIONS: The choice of antidepressant treatment for patients with Long COVID is fraught because of the frequent occurrence of subclinical (interictal) epileptiform activity in the EEG. Consequently, antidepressant medications with a proconvulsant effect are contraindicated for Long COVID patients. CMZ may be a promising alternative for the treatment of depressive disorders in Long COVID states, given its mood-stabilizer, antidepressant, and antiepileptic profile.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , COVID-19 , Anticonvulsants/adverse effects , Antidepressive Agents/adverse effects , Benzodiazepines , COVID-19/complications , Carbamazepine/adverse effects , Depression , Humans , Pharmacogenetics , Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome
14.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol ; 78(10): 1697-1701, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1982116

ABSTRACT

Management and dose adjustment are a major concern for clinicians in the absence of specific clinical outcome data for patients on antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), in the event of short-term (5 days) nirmatrelvir/ritonavir co-exposure. Therefore, in this report, we identified drugs that require dose adjustment because of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and AEDs. We hereby used four databases (Micromedex Drug Interaction, Liverpool Drug Interaction Group for COVID-19 Therapies, Medscape Drug Interaction Checker, and Lexicomp Drug Interactions) and DDI-Predictor.In the light of applying the DDI-Predictor, for carbamazepine, clobazam, oxcarbazepine, eslicarbazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, pentobarbital, rufinamide, and valproate as CYP3A4 inducers, we recommend that a dose adjustment of short-term nirmatrelvir/ritonavir as a substrate (victim) drug would be more appropriate instead of these AEDs to avoid impending DDI-related threats in patients with epilepsy.


Subject(s)
Anticonvulsants , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Carbamazepine/therapeutic use , Clobazam , Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A Inducers , Drug Interactions , Humans , Oxcarbazepine , Pentobarbital , Phenobarbital , Phenytoin , Ritonavir/therapeutic use , Valproic Acid/therapeutic use
15.
Intern Med ; 61(15): 2287-2293, 2022 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1968929

ABSTRACT

Objective To investigate seizure control in patients with epilepsy during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Method A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted, and the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were comprehensively searched for relevant studies. Studies that reported seizure control in patients with epilepsy during the COVID-19 pandemic were included. Pooled proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of patients with epilepsy who experienced seizure worsening during the COVID-19 pandemic were assessed using a random-effects model. The quality of the assessment for each study, heterogeneity between the studies, and publication bias were also evaluated. Subgroup analyses were performed, excluding studies with reports of seizures worsening from caregivers. Results A total of 24 studies with 6,492 patients/caregivers were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled proportion of seizure worsening was 18.5% (95% CI: 13.9-23.6; I2=96%; p<0.01). The pooled proportion of seizure worsening in the subgroup analysis was 18.9% (95% CI: 13.5-25.0; I2=96%; p<0.01). Conclusion Although the heterogeneity was high, our results showed a relatively high incidence of seizure worsening during the COVID-19 pandemic. During the COVID-19 pandemic, physicians should be aware of the likelihood of worsening seizures in patients with epilepsy.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Epilepsies, Partial , Epilepsy, Generalized , Epilepsy , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , COVID-19/epidemiology , Epilepsies, Partial/drug therapy , Epilepsy/complications , Epilepsy/drug therapy , Epilepsy/epidemiology , Epilepsy, Generalized/drug therapy , Humans , Pandemics , Seizures/drug therapy , Seizures/epidemiology
16.
Epilepsy Behav ; 134: 108822, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1907890

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination coverage, willingness, and safety profiles in patients with epilepsy remain poorly understood. We aimed to summarize the available evidence of COVID-19 vaccination coverage, willingness, and safety profiles among patients with epilepsy. METHODS: We performed a literature search in the Pubmed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register database between 1 January 2020 and 30 April 2022. We included eligible studies that provided information on the COVID-19 vaccination coverage, willingness, and safety profiles among patients with epilepsy. We investigated the association between baseline characteristics of patients with epilepsy and unvaccination status using a fixed-effect model. We calculated the pooled overall willingness to be vaccinated against COVID-19. We systematically reviewed the safety profiles after COVID-19 vaccination in patients with epilepsy. RESULTS: Ten eligible observational studies and two case reports yielded 2589 participants with epilepsy or their caregivers. Among 2145 participants that provided the information of vaccination status, 1508 (70.3%) patients with epilepsy were not administered COVID-19 vaccine, and 58% (95%CI 40-75%) of respondents were willing to be vaccinated against COVID-19. Seizure status (active versus inactive, OR 1.84 95%CI 1.41-2.39, I2 = 0%) rather than seizure type (focal versus non-focal, OR 1.22 95%CI 0.94-1.58, I2 = 0%) was associated with COVID-19 unvaccination status. Vaccines were well-tolerated; epilepsy-related problems such as increase in seizure frequency and status epilepticus after COVID-19 vaccination were uncommon. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest a low COVID-19 vaccination coverage and willingness in patients with epilepsy. Vaccination against COVID-19 appears to be well-tolerated and safe in patients with epilepsy, supporting a positive outlook toward vaccination in this population.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Epilepsies, Partial , Epilepsy , Anticonvulsants , COVID-19 Vaccines , Humans , Seizures
17.
Drugs Aging ; 39(6): 467-475, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1899385

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To limit the introduction of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) into nursing homes, restrictive measures and social distancing were implemented; however, these caused an increase in affective disorders such as depression and anxiety and an alteration of the behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia. Therefore, it is expected that prescription trends of psychotropic drugs in nursing homes during the pandemic may have changed significantly. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare patterns of prescribing psychotropic drugs in nursing homes during the COVID-19 pandemic to those of the pre-pandemic period. METHODS: This cross-sectional multicenter study was conducted in geriatric units and psychogeriatric units in seven nursing homes in Gipuzkoa, Spain. On 1 March, 2020, data regarding 511 residents in geriatric units and 163 in psychogeriatric units were recorded. This study examined utilization percentages for psychotropic drugs before the pandemic (April 2018-March 2020) and during the pandemic (April 2020-March 2021) in light of projected usage based on previous years. Following the Anatomical, Therapeutic, Chemical Classification System, four therapeutic groups were analyzed: antipsychotics (N05A), benzodiazepines (N05B and N05C), antidepressants (N06A), and antiepileptic drugs (N03A). RESULTS: In the case of geriatric units, a downward trend of prescription was reversed for antipsychotics (-0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.41, 0.60). Benzodiazepine use also decreased less than expected (-2.00; 95% CI -3.00, -1.00). Antidepressant use increased more than predicted (0.02; 95% CI -0.97, 1.01), as did antiepileptic drug use (2.93; 95% CI 2.27, 3.60). In the psychogeriatric units, the drop in antipsychotic utilization was less than expected (-2.31; 95% CI -3.68, -0.93). Although it was expected that the prescription of benzodiazepines would decrease, usage remained roughly the same (-0.28; 95% CI -2.40, 2.34). Utilization of antidepressants (8.57; 95% CI 6.89, 10.24) and antiepileptic drugs (6.10; 95% CI 3.20, 9.00) increased significantly, which was expected, based on the forecast. CONCLUSIONS: For all categories, usage of psychotropic drugs was higher than anticipated based on the forecast; this increase might be related to the worsening of emotional and behavioral disorders caused by the restrictive measures of the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Aged , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Benzodiazepines , Cross-Sectional Studies , Drug Prescriptions , Drug Utilization , Humans , Nursing Homes , Pandemics , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use
18.
Molecules ; 27(11)2022 May 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1892922

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Heterocyclic compounds and their fused analogs, which contain pharmacophore fragments such as pyridine, thiophene and pyrimidine rings, are of great interest due to their broad spectrum of biological activity. Chemical compounds containing two or more pharmacophore groups due to additional interactions with active receptor centers usually enhance biological activity and can even lead to a new type of activity. The search for new effective neurotropic drugs in the series of derivatives of heterocycles containing pharmacophore groups in organic, bioorganic and medical chemistry is a serious problem. METHODS: Modern methodology of drugs involves synthesis, physicochemical study, molecular modeling and selection of active compounds through virtual screening and experimental evaluation of the biological activity of new chimeric compounds with pharmacophore fragments. For the synthesis of new compounds, classical organic methods were used and developed. For the evaluation of neurotropic activity of new synthesized compounds, some biological methods were used according to indicators characterizing anticonvulsant, sedative and antianxiety activity as well as side effects. For docking analysis, various soft ware packages and methods were used. RESULTS: As a result of multistep reactions, 11 new, tri- and tetracyclic heterocyclic systems were obtained. The studied compounds exhibit protection against pentylenetetrazole (PTZ) seizures as well as some psychotropic effects. The biological assays evidenced that nine of the eleven studied compounds showed a high anticonvulsant activity by antagonism with pentylenetetrazole. The toxicity of the compounds is low, and they do not induce muscle relaxation in the studied doses. According to the study of psychotropic activity, it was found that the selected compounds have an activating behavior and anxiolytic effects on the "open field" and "elevated plus maze" (EPM) models. The data obtained indicate the anxiolytic (antianxiety) activity of the derivatives of tricyclic thieno[2,3-b]pyridines and tetracyclic pyridothieno[3,2-d]pyrimidin-8-ones, especially pronounced in compounds 3b-f and 4e. The studied compounds increase the latent time of first immobilization on the "forced swimming" (FS) model and exhibit antidepressant effects; compounds 3e and 3f especially exhibit these effects, similarly to diazepam. Docking studies revealed that compounds 3c and 4b bound tightly in the active site of γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABAA) receptors with a value of the scoring function that estimates free energy of binding (∆G) at -10.0 ± 5 kcal/mol. Compound 4e showed the best affinity ((∆G) at -11.0 ± 0.54 kcal/mol) and seems to be an inhibitor of serotonin (SERT) transporter. Compounds 3c-f and 4e practically bound with the groove of T4L of 5HT_1A and blocked it completely, while the best affinity observed was in compound 3f ((∆G) at -9.3 ± 0.46 kcal/mol). CONCLUSIONS: The selected compounds have an anticonvulsant, activating behavior and anxiolytic effects and at the same time exhibit antidepressant effects.


Subject(s)
Anti-Anxiety Agents , Pentylenetetrazole , Anti-Anxiety Agents/pharmacology , Anticonvulsants/chemistry , Antidepressive Agents/pharmacology , Molecular Docking Simulation , Pentylenetetrazole/adverse effects , Pyridines/chemistry , Pyrimidines/chemistry , Receptors, GABA-A , Structure-Activity Relationship
19.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 79(18): 1592-1598, 2022 09 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1890862

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To describe the presence, type, and management of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) at prescription cannabidiol (CBD) therapy initiation. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, retrospective study of patients prescribed CBD from a medical center's neurology clinic for seizure management from January 2019 through April 2020. Patients were excluded if they were enrolled in a CBD clinical trial or the insurance approval or medication fulfillment process was not completed by the center's specialty pharmacy. The primary outcomes were the numbers, types, and management of DDIs identified at the time of CBD prescribing. RESULTS: Of the 136 patients included, 109 (80%) had a DDI identified at baseline. Of the 260 DDIs, 71% (n = 184) were pharmacodynamic and 29% (n = 76) were pharmacokinetic in nature. Management of the 260 DDIs detected included counseling only (89% [n = 232 interactions]), discontinuation of the interacting agent [9% (n = 22 interactions]), and dosage change for the interacting agent [2% (n = 6 interactions]). Clobazam was the most commonly identified interacting medication (n = 63, 24%), while valproic acid accounted for 10% (n = 26) of the DDIs. The population was predominantly white (n = 115, 85%), 18 years of age or younger (n = 92, 68%), and had an indication for prescription CBD treatment of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (n = 117, 86%). CONCLUSION: This study provides new information on the role that integrated specialty pharmacists can play in identifying and managing initial DDIs in patients starting prescription CBD.


Subject(s)
Cannabidiol , Epilepsy , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Cannabidiol/therapeutic use , Drug Interactions , Epilepsy/drug therapy , Humans , Pharmacists , Prescriptions , Retrospective Studies
20.
J Clin Neurosci ; 101: 112-117, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1851610

ABSTRACT

We describea series of patients with COVID-19 who presented with seizures, reported in the Spanish Society of Neurology's COVID-19 Registry. This observational, descriptive,multicentre, registry-based study includes patients with confirmed COVID-19 who experienced seizures during active infection.Wedescribe theclinicalpresentation of COVID-19,seizures,and resultsof complementary tests.Wealsodescribe the suspectedaetiologyof the seizures. Of 232 reported cases, 26 (11.2%) presented with seizures;7 of these patients (26.9%) had prior history of epilepsy, whereas the remaining 19 (73.1%) had no history of seizures.In most cases, seizures presented on days 0 and 7 after onset of COVID-19. By seizure type, 8 patients (30.7%) presentedgeneralised tonic-clonic seizures, 7 (26.9%) status epilepticus, 8 (30.7%) focal impaired-awareness seizures, and 4 (11.7%) secondary generalised seizures.Six patients (23.1%) also presented other neurological symptoms, includingaltered mental status and decreased level of consciousness. Predisposing factors for seizures (eg, dementia, tumour, cerebrovascular disease) were observed in 10 of the 19 patients with no prior history of epilepsy (52.6%). Patients with COVID-19 may present with seizures over the course of the disease,either alone or in the context of encephalopathy.Seizures may present in patients with no prior history of epilepsy; however, most of these patients present predisposing factors.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Epilepsy, Tonic-Clonic , Epilepsy , Neurology , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , COVID-19/complications , Electroencephalography , Epilepsy/drug therapy , Epilepsy/epidemiology , Epilepsy/etiology , Epilepsy, Tonic-Clonic/drug therapy , Humans , Registries , Seizures/drug therapy , Seizures/epidemiology , Seizures/etiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL